American Physical Society Sites
|
APS
|
Journals
|
PhysicsCentral
|
Physics
Become a Member
|
Contact Us
Journals of the American Physical Society
APS News
Physics
Physics Today
Capitol Hill Quarterly
Other APS Publications
Reciprocal Society Newsletters
March Meeting
April Meeting
Meeting Calendar
Abstract Submission
Archives of the Bulletin of the American Physical Society
Policies & Guidelines
Meeting Presentations
Virtual Press Rooms
Education
International Affairs
Physics for All
Women in Physics
Minorities in Physics
Prizes, Awards & Fellows
Join APS
Renew Membership
Member Directory
My Member Profile
Member Services
APS Units
Issues
Reports & Studies
APS Statements
Advocacy Tools
Advocacy Resources
Fellowships & Fellows
Contact APS Public Affairs
Physics Jobs
Becoming a Physicist
Career Guidance
Statistical Data
Mission Statement
Society Governance
Society History
Support APS
APS Jobs
Contact Us
Education
Why Study Physics?
K - 8
High School
Undergraduate
Graduate
Education Conferences
Ethics Case Studies
International Affairs
Physics for All
Women in Physics
Minorities in Physics
Prizes, Awards & Fellows
Email
Print
Share
Physicists/Scientists
Physics Enthusiasts
Policy Makers
Media
Students & Educators
Librarians
Home
|
Programs
|
Education
|
Ethics Case Studies
|
Responsible Conduct and Participation
|
What Is Appropriate in Tenure Review?
What Is Appropriate in Tenure Review?
Responsible Conduct of Research and Participation
Description of the Problem
You are in a group of faculty considering a person for tenure.
Question
In setting criteria and standards, would it be appropriate to demand criteria that you, yourself, would not satisfy?